Search
Close this search box.
C919 aircraft, China's self-innovation, Chinese propaganda, foreign technology, components, debunking, truth, high-end manufacturing, global sourcing, aircraft industry
Fact CheckThread

Exposing the Reality Behind China’s C919 Aircraft: Debunking Chinese Propaganda

Chinese propaganda outlets have been touting the C919 aircraft as a symbol of China’s self-developed high-end manufacturing. However, a closer look at the components and technology used in the C919 reveals a different story. In this blog post, we will delve into each tweet of a revealing thread that uncovers the truth behind China’s claims and exposes the extent of foreign reliance in the C919 aircraft.

Most components rely on foreign technology:

The thread begins by highlighting that the C919 heavily relies on foreign technology. One crucial example is the LEAP-1C engine, which powers the aircraft. This engine is manufactured by CFM International, a joint venture between GE Aerospace of the US and Safran Aircraft Engines of France. This fact contradicts China’s narrative of the C919 being a domestically developed aircraft.

Check this source

Honeywell’s contribution:

Honeywell, a US-based industrial giant, plays a significant role in the C919’s construction. They supply crucial components such as wheels and brakes, flight control electronics, navigation packages, and auxiliary power systems. This demonstrates yet another instance of foreign involvement in the C919’s development.

Check this source

Collins Aerospace’s contribution:

Collins Aerospace, a US company, provides various aircraft systems for the C919. These systems include in-flight entertainment, integrated communication, navigation, surveillance, and cabin core systems. Again, this reliance on foreign technology contradicts China’s claims of self-innovation.

Check this source-

Source 1

Source 2

Source 3

Source 4

Moog’s involvement in the high lift system:

The high lift system of the C919, responsible for controlling flap and slat movements, is supplied by Moog, a US-based designer and manufacturer. Moog’s contribution encompasses flap and slat actuation, pilot interfaces, electronic controls, power drive units, wing tip brakes, gearboxes, and miscellaneous components. This further emphasizes the foreign dependency of the C919’s critical components.

Check this source

Foreign tire suppliers:

The thread reveals that the C919’s OE and RT tire supplier is Michelin, a French tire giant. Additionally, the Tire Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS) is supplied by Crane Aerospace and Electronics, a US-headquartered company. These foreign suppliers underline the global sourcing strategy employed by China rather than domestic innovation.

Check this source

Liebherr-Aerospace’s involvement:

Germany-Swiss multinational manufacturer Liebherr-Aerospace provides the landing gear system and integrated air management systems for the C919. This demonstrates that even core systems required for safe operation are sourced from foreign companies.

Check this source-

Source 1

Source 2

Source 3

InFlight Entertainment & Connectivity (IFEC):

French multinational company Thales Paris supplies the InFlight Entertainment & Connectivity (IFEC) systems for the C919. Once again, China’s claims of self-innovation are debunked, as foreign companies are responsible for providing essential passenger entertainment and communication features.

Check this source-

Source 1

Source 2

Source 3

Source 4

Parker Aerospace’s contribution:

US-based Parker Aerospace is responsible for supplying the hydraulic systems, actuators, and fuel systems for the C919. Their involvement in critical systems further highlights the lack of genuine self-innovation in China’s aircraft manufacturing industry.

The reality of China’s self-innovation claims:

The thread concludes by asserting that China’s declaration of the C919 as a self-innovated, homemade aircraft is misleading. When the majority of crucial components and technologies are sourced from foreign suppliers, the aircraft can hardly be considered domestically developed. The disinformation factory, Global Times, is exposed for spreading false narratives.

Conclusion:

This detailed analysis of the tweets reveals the truth behind China’s claims of self-innovation in the C919 aircraft. Despite Chinese propaganda outlets projecting the C919 as a domestically developed aircraft, the extensive reliance on foreign technology and components exposes a different reality. By debunking these claims, it becomes clear that the C919 is not a true example of China’s high-end manufacturing capabilities, but rather an assembly job utilizing foreign expertise and technology.

For more insightful content and updates, follow us on Twitter (@dintentdata) and visit our blog. Stay informed about the truth behind global events and unravel the hidden narratives. Join the conversation and gain valuable insights into the world around us. Follow us now on Twitter and explore our blog for more!

Related posts

No, This Image Doesn’t Show Deforestation By Kuki Community in Manipur, Here is The Truth: Fact-Check

Editor D-Intent Data

#FACTCHECK_CLAIM”Nigerian student are being attacked in a University Campus near Delhi

Editor D-Intent Data

Uttar Pradesh Police Beat Devotees in Mathura, Falsely Claimed To Be From Kolkata, West Bengal: Fact-Check 

Editor D-Intent Data
Translate »